10-31-2017, 11:57 AM
Aye, it was the sheriff court till '86, and is now a bar and flats.
|
10-31-2017, 11:57 AM
Aye, it was the sheriff court till '86, and is now a bar and flats.
10-31-2017, 12:08 PM
10-31-2017, 12:24 PM
(10-31-2017, 11:32 AM)Bill Cosby Wrote: (10-31-2017, 12:08 PM)Roger H. Sterling Wrote: What do you mean wow? None of that was my opinion Both sexes can be sexually 'aroused' without wanting to be. Women can orgasm during rape and men can get involuntary erections. A man can still be raped by a woman. Think that's what he's getting at.
10-31-2017, 12:34 PM
(10-31-2017, 12:24 PM)TheMaganator4.0 Wrote: Both sexes can be sexually 'aroused' without wanting to be. I know all of this. Do you not agree that male on female sexual assault is more invasive, more intrusive, more damaging, more personal, than female on male? There's a reason there's different laws for both, and it's nought to do with my opinion. Not sure what the arousal has to do with it. It's the physical act of penetration that brings a harsher sentence.
10-31-2017, 12:36 PM
(10-31-2017, 12:34 PM)Roger H. Sterling Wrote: I know all of this. Do you not agree that male on female sexual assault is more invasive, more intrusive, more damaging, more personal, than female on male? There's a reason there's different laws for both, and it's nought to do with my opinion. No, I do not agree.
10-31-2017, 12:37 PM
10-31-2017, 12:42 PM
To have sex with someone underage is equally wrong whether you are a man or a woman.
10-31-2017, 12:50 PM
(10-31-2017, 12:42 PM)Bill Cosby Wrote: To have sex with someone underage is equally wrong whether you are a man or a woman. I don't disagree with that all. We were discussing the severity of the sentence in terms of gender equality. All I meant was that the crimes, whilst equally illegal, hold a different weight in court when the genders are reversed, based on the biology of the act. Women don't have penises to penetrate their victims with so they can't be charged with penetrating anyone with their penis, which in law is seen as a worse crime than penetrating yourself with a males penis without his consent.
10-31-2017, 01:05 PM
10-31-2017, 02:06 PM
(10-31-2017, 12:50 PM)Roger H. Sterling Wrote: I don't disagree with that all. We were discussing the severity of the sentence in terms of gender equality. All I meant was that the crimes, whilst equally illegal, hold a different weight in court when the genders are reversed, based on the biology of the act. Women don't have penises to penetrate their victims with so they can't be charged with penetrating anyone with their penis, which in law is seen as a worse crime than penetrating yourself with a males penis without his consent. What about if she flings a plaster cast of the bloke's cock up his own arsehole? Makes you think.
10-31-2017, 03:05 PM
10-31-2017, 03:13 PM
"he had specifically asked not to change current signs but to set a precedent for the new signs."
"You’ll do plums"
10-31-2017, 03:16 PM
![]() :morphresigning:
10-31-2017, 03:21 PM
(Edited 10-31-2017, 03:22 PM by Walter Sobchak.)
Looks like a hibs cunt with that ball.
10-31-2017, 04:57 PM
Worst poster 2017
10-31-2017, 07:50 PM
Breaking news of multiple people being shot in New York.
10-31-2017, 09:29 PM
8 dead.
![]() Just fucking exterminate that cunt man.
10-31-2017, 09:30 PM
Quite glad we got one of these cunts alive for a change, tbh.
"You’ll do plums"
|
|
|