(02-14-2016, 09:48 AM)Francis Begbie Wrote: Yes, I did know all of that, and I'm not even going to get into the abortion debate hereI'm more interested in the casting of any Obama appointment in the role of a vile baby murderer - the language used is so egregiously hyperbolic it's laughable. The level of discourse in the USA has degenerated into nonsense in recent years; this is what happens when you pander to the lunatic fringe of your party. I remember when bipartisanship used to be a thing
I'm quite sure he will have reported objectively on plenty of things that conflict with his faith as a sports reporter in the past. He's reading off an autocue on a soft news programme in the morning; I doubt he's going to go Howard Beale on us. As for the second point, why should we censor the views of people because we disagree with them?
Edit: oh, it was a 'troll'. I see.
Because it's made up bullshit perhaps? If i went round ranting that i believe santa claus is actually real, I'd imagine and I'd hope people would tell me to shut the fuck up and probably book me into Hartwood.

I'm more interested in the casting of any Obama appointment in the role of a vile baby murderer - the language used is so egregiously hyperbolic it's laughable. The level of discourse in the USA has degenerated into nonsense in recent years; this is what happens when you pander to the lunatic fringe of your party. I remember when bipartisanship used to be a thing