http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/26/opinio...p_1=526064

Trump looking to increase the nuclear capability of the US,

Probably a good idea if you don't fancy learning Russian

Agreed, 10k nuclear weapons just isnt enough.

(12-22-2016, 10:43 PM)2NaMacPheesh Wrote: Agreed, 10k nuclear weapons just isnt enough.

Are most of them not in France though? Can't really trust those cunts in a war tbh

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-38411935

(12-22-2016, 10:09 PM)Drederick Bjorntum Wrote: Trump looking to increase the nuclear capability of the US,

I'm assuming quality over quantity. Efficiency Drederick, in a time where the need for sustainability is paramount.

(12-22-2016, 11:45 PM)pondlife Wrote: I'm assuming quality over quantity.  Efficiency Drederick, in a time where the need for sustainability is paramount.

"strengthen and expand"

(12-23-2016, 12:32 AM)2NaMacPheesh Wrote: "strengthen and expand"

Range, perhaps? Efficiency.

How effective does a nuclear warhead need to be pondlife?

Free irn bru xtra near the apple store
On princes st, 12x500ml

Surely there will be some in Glasgow as well?

So the berlin attacker has been shot dead in Italy.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-suffolk-38267086

Quite a strangeone; also very odd, IMO, that the police haven't searched the landfill site?

"Signals showed his Microsoft Lumia 435 mobile phone had moved to nearby Barton Mills, where there is a landfill site, and police searched a bin lorry after finding its route matched the movements of the device.
However, it was found that the weight of the bin lorry's load was 15kg (33lb) - too light to have contained Mr Mckeague.
As a result, the lorry was released and the landfill site was not searched."

(12-29-2016, 12:12 PM)Walter Sobchak Wrote: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-suffolk-38267086

Quite a strangeone; also very odd, IMO, that the police haven't searched the landfill site?

"Signals showed his Microsoft Lumia 435 mobile phone had moved to nearby Barton Mills, where there is a landfill site, and police searched a bin lorry after finding its route matched the movements of the device.
However, it was found that the weight of the bin lorry's load was 15kg (33lb) - too light to have contained Mr Mckeague.
As a result, the lorry was released and the landfill site was not searched."

He could have been in the lorry cab, rather than in the hold at the back, I suppose.

If you can't get out without being on CCTV then he has to have been in one of the vehicles that left the 'Horseshoe'. I am not sure what other explanation there could be.

More likely his phone was dumped in the bin.

As to where he went

It was around the time some other squaddie was nearly kidnapped

(12-29-2016, 12:24 PM)TheMaganator2.0 Wrote: He could have been in the lorry cab, rather than in the hold at the back, I suppose.

If you can't get out without being on CCTV then he has to have been in one of the vehicles that left the 'Horseshoe'. I am not sure what other explanation there could be.

I was busy last night and couldn't watch Jonathan Creek. If you're going to discuss it then please use the spoiler tags.

Party strange. Surely there's a limited number of possibilities? If he's in the horsehoe, can't leave by foot without being seen, wasn't seen, so didn't leave by foot, then he's in a vehicle. If they can see anyone who walks then they can see all the vehicles. How can't they check those vehicles? If he's fallen in the bin and ended up at a landfill, why aren't they checking that? Not buying into kidnap, too random.