(05-13-2015, 02:09 PM)S.J. Wrote: ^ That Mak and Rog thing.

^ Scott and Rog

^Mak Scott and Rog thing

^ Mak, Scott, Rog, and Vlad thing

(05-13-2015, 02:30 PM)Roger H. Sterling Wrote: ^ Mak, Scott, Rog, and Vlad thing

^ Chrambo, Mak, Scott, Rog and Vlad just can't help themselves

(05-13-2015, 02:33 PM)S.J. Wrote: ^ Chrambo, Mak, Scott, Rog and Vlad just can't help themselves

Leave me alone, you weirdo.

(05-13-2015, 02:36 PM)Roger H. Sterling Wrote: Leave me alone, you weirdo.

(05-13-2015, 02:36 PM)Roger H. Sterling Wrote: Leave me alone, you weirdo.

^ Mak and Rog.

(05-13-2015, 03:15 PM)Makween Wrote: ^ Mak and Rog.

Leave me alone, you weirdo.

Not even a single possy rep for quoting Voltaire at a fucking beautifully germane moment? Sickening.

Not quite as sickening as reading what feels like thousands upon thousands of those little pissing arrows with "Mak and Rog" all over the board. I'm on the verge of making my peace with Dave McLaren and starting up the dot counts.

(05-13-2015, 04:01 PM)Francis Begbie Wrote: Not even a single possy rep for quoting Voltaire at a fucking beautifully germane moment? Sickening.

Not quite as sickening as reading what feels like thousands upon thousands of those little pissing arrows with "Mak and Rog" all over the board. I'm on the verge of making my peace with Dave McLaren and starting up the dot counts.

I promise I'll stop pointing out the way in which Roger keeps following me about the forum just as soon as he stops doing it. That'll probably be never. Sorry.

(05-13-2015, 04:01 PM)Francis Begbie Wrote: Not even a single possy rep for quoting Voltaire at a fucking beautifully germane moment? Sickening.

Not quite as sickening as reading what feels like thousands upon thousands of those little pissing arrows with "Mak and Rog" all over the board. I'm on the verge of making my peace with Dave McLaren and starting up the dot counts.

Right? The only "Mak and Rog" thing left is his obsession with pointing out whenever I reply to his posts. Really strange behaviour. Almost as if he can't let go.

I'm actually at a point where I'm siding with Roger, and that is a dark avenue I never thought I would walk down

Ask yourselves this: if Roger isn't following me around, how come I'm getting so many chances to say it?

The guy is an obsessive weirdo.

(05-13-2015, 04:10 PM)Makween Wrote: Ask yourselves this: if Roger isn't following me around, how come I'm getting so many chances to say it?

The guy is an obsessive weirdo.

Because I've got 3000 posts on a forum that has 20 active members, and you're one of them. Anyone could do what you're doing to any other poster on the board. That's how the forum works.

So what's your reason for doing it? If it's to try let everyone know that I'm "instigating" things by engaging you in conversation, then you should know that no one cares and you're just making yourself look really petty. If it's to wind me up, then carry on, but all that does is show that you're heavily invested in the "Mak and Rog" schtick and are quite clearly instigating in an attempt to get a bite.

Which is it?

It's all Roger's fault, as Makween has never followed anyone about the board before.

:begbie:

Ulysses

^ Mak and Rog

(05-13-2015, 04:23 PM)Francis Begbie Wrote: It's all Roger's fault, as Makween has never followed anyone about the board before.

:begbie:

Ulysses

^ Mak and Rog

I've followed you, Dexter and to an extent even Scott and Partridge more than I have Roger. Which is kind of the point.

Your final example is bizarre, though. On what planet is pointing it out every time that Roger tries to instigate an argument with me (i.e. about five times a day) an example of me following Roger? I'd do it less if he wasn't such an oddball stalker.

If I'm instigating arguments, why are the only arguments we're having about your incessant need to point at my posts? Can you answer why you're doing it please?

Can we not all just let things go and start again? I value you both as posters.

The whole point here is that there never was a 'Mak and Rog'. All there ever was was you instigating arguments and me biting; now you're still trying to instigate those arguments, but the difference is that the closest thing you've been getting to a bite is me pointing out your attempts to instigate arguments.

That should also answer your question: there are no arguments because I'm only responding to your attempts to instigate them by saying '^ Mak and Rog'. Note that when you actually started being civil in the Ice Cream thread I didn't say it, but when you said you could batter me ( ) in the Back Room I did.

Anyway, I've allowed myself to be dragged into an argument again here despite myself but this is as far as it goes. I've made my position clear and if you want me to stop pointing out how much of a weirdo stalker you are then the best way to achieve that would be to stop following me about the board. Thanks for your understanding in this matter and best of luck with your entrepreneurial ventures. If you feel the need to get the last word at this point then I'll understand as I like to have the last word too.

(05-13-2015, 04:47 PM)S.J. Wrote: Can we not all just let things go and start again? I value you both as posters.

I'm trying, Scott. But Mak can't accept that I'm treating him just the same as I do you, or anyone else. He needs our special relationship to feel relevant, I feel. It's the only explanation.