Just started watching it now, I remember it vaguely from the time but obviously don't know too much about it. will keep an open mind.

(02-24-2021, 09:10 PM)Papin Wrote: Jodi Jones programme on channel 5. Looks like their agenda is about Luke Mitchell being innocent

Mind there was some campaigner arguing his case on JKB back in the day.

His mum 

(02-24-2021, 09:44 PM)Herzog Wrote: His mum 

Yup!

She was absolutely batshit mental over the road.

Although on reflection, she fitted in pretty well over there in the end.

Was acey his lawyer? Seems the sort of case he would manage to lose

(02-24-2021, 09:46 PM)The road to Gnanduillet Wrote: Was acey his lawyer? Seems the sort of case he would manage to lose

It was Acey's hero big Donny Findlay QC

(02-24-2021, 09:46 PM)The road to Gnanduillet Wrote: Was acey his lawyer? Seems the sort of case he would manage to lose

Acey could defend an innocent man all the way to death row.

There's not been one person represented in this who believes he's guilty.

(02-24-2021, 09:54 PM)Morph Wrote: There's not been one person represented in this who believes he's guilty.

They've shown that he was weird and liked his satan graffiti and all that shit what more do you think they should do?

The programmes not going to be, Luke Mitchell was jailed for this and aw btw it was definitely luke Mitchell that did it. The End.

Deary me

(02-24-2021, 09:54 PM)Morph Wrote: There's not been one person represented in this who believes he's guilty.

That's what happens when you choose your own narrative and then only bring in people to back you up on said narrative.

It's like Lennon and his media pals, they've built a narrative that he was hard done to and shafted by a Cheltic board, while making no mention of the fact that the same Cheltic board gave him a job when no one else would touch him.

But no one will step up and say otherwise, because it doesn't suit the narrative.

(02-24-2021, 10:01 PM)Morph Wrote:

Deary me

What is the documentary a lie about the dna and all that? I'm just watching as someone who doesn't know anything about the case really, maybe you know more.

Hes had a few independant polygraphs. I think they are 96 odd % accurate per question and hes had a few polygraphs. Even if he was asked 10 questions in total then its still pretty amazing that he passed them all.

If i was guilty there is absolutely no chance i would take a test to try and beat it.

Even if he read up how to beat the test he was taking a million to one shot just to beat the first test let alone the others he has taken.

Ps. My level of understanding polygraph tests is at best, Jeremy Kyle level.

(02-24-2021, 10:10 PM)Herzog Wrote: Hes had a few independant polygraphs. I think they are 96 odd % accurate per question and hes had a few polygraphs. Even if he was asked 10 questions in total then its still pretty amazing that he passed them all.

If i was guilty there is absolutely no chance i would take a test to try and beat it.

Even if he read up how to beat the test he was taking a million to one shot just to beat the first test let alone the others he has taken.

Ps. My level of understanding polygraph tests is at best, Jeremy Kyle level.

Polygraph's are bunk. They've got about a 48% accuracy iirc, which on a yes/no is worse than a coin toss.

Not sure what they were trying to achieve with their one-sided approach.

These Weegie clowns were going on about the last (now dead) suspect looking quite similar to Mitchell - it's not as if someone witnessed the crime and described what the murderer looked like, ffs.

I think the point they're trying to put across is there may be reasonable doubt about who actually committed the murder, that's the vibes I got anyway.

Why are people so sure it was Mitchell?

Deliberately didn't watch it because I knew the way it was being set up as a show to try and prove the cunts innocence. 

He's guilty as sin, never heard anyone involved in the case or who knew him or his family give any doubt that he was guilty either.

Don't think anyone is saying they know exactly what happened but programs like that do fuck all except create a wee conspiracy theory with no actual real proof of anything.  The only real thing that stands out in that program is the DNA evidence part, the rest is garbage.

Do you not think all of this stuff was gone through at the time nah?  I suppose you wouldn't know because they didn't bother to actually represent anything other than spinning a narrative that he's innocent.  

No thought of Jones' family at all when making that either.  Really disrespectful to not give a balanced account of what went on.

(02-24-2021, 10:37 PM)Morph Wrote: Don't think anyone is saying they know exactly what happened but programs like that do fuck all except create a wee conspiracy theory with no actual real proof of anything.  The only real thing that stands out in that program is the DNA evidence part, the rest is garbage.

Do you not think all of this stuff was gone through at the time nah?  I suppose you wouldn't know because they didn't bother to actually represent anything other than spinning a narrative that he's innocent.  

No thought of Jones' family at all when making that either.  Really disrespectful to not give a balanced account of what went on.

So you don't think it deserves any attention despite there being seemingly legitimate reasons to doubt whether he is guilty or not?

I said in previous posts I don't know anything about the case, obviously you know more and that points to him definitely being guilty but they just aren't showing that.

If the case is going to be analysed by documentary makers I think it deserves more respect than what it got from channel 5.

No idea why you seem to think I have him nailed on as guilty when I already told you I know fuck all about it.

https://www.hmfckickback.co.uk/index.php...l/page/15/

The highlight of the thread is Snake calling Sandra Lean a “Six Pinter” only for her to later post on the thread