03-28-2017, 09:20 PM
|
03-28-2017, 09:21 PM
Don't necessarily have an issue with his sentence being reduced and his charge being changed, it's the jubilation being shown that has me uneasy. The media are treating him as a hero and as if he's been exonerated, I realise all the stories say differently but the way it's being reported is all a bit crass for me.
He's a war criminal at the end of the day and should be treated like one.
03-28-2017, 09:23 PM
Isn't it better to be murdered shot on the battlefield than taken prisoner by the infidel.
03-28-2017, 09:24 PM
(03-28-2017, 09:21 PM)Charlie Kelly Wrote: Don't necessarily have an issue with his sentence being reduced and his charge being changed, it's the jubilation being shown that has me uneasy. The media are treating him as a hero and as if he's been exonerated, I realise all the stories say differently but the way it's being reported is all a bit crass for me. ![]() He shouldn't be lauded (and the "ISIS WOULD'VE DONE THE SAME" argument is one of the worst ever), but the "left to rot" stuff is silly and hysterical too.
03-28-2017, 09:37 PM
(03-28-2017, 09:21 PM)Charlie Kelly Wrote: Don't necessarily have an issue with his sentence being reduced and his charge being changed, it's the jubilation being shown that has me uneasy. The media are treating him as a hero and as if he's been exonerated, I realise all the stories say differently but the way it's being reported is all a bit crass for me. I agree with this. I fully appreciate that conditions would be horrific and don't want to castigate the soldier unduly but it was cold blooded murder and he deserves a punishment that takes all of that in to account. The idea that oor laddies can do no wrong in defence of Queen and Country is troubling and widespread.
03-28-2017, 09:55 PM
Do the folk we're fighting follow the Geneva convention?
03-28-2017, 10:05 PM
03-28-2017, 10:06 PM
03-28-2017, 10:07 PM
03-28-2017, 10:19 PM
If we should be then so should they, but they don't, so neither should we.
Can't be playing the same game with two sets of rules now can you?
03-28-2017, 10:50 PM
Maybe we should start strapping bairns with C4 vests and sending them into their hospitals
03-28-2017, 11:42 PM
(Edited 03-28-2017, 11:42 PM by Big Physical Acey.)
03-29-2017, 12:00 AM
(03-28-2017, 08:57 PM)Bubbles Wrote: He's just saying the generic 'right' thing to say, we all know what's right but it would be pretty flat if nobody took an opposing view. This is about the most simple minded thing I've ever read. (03-28-2017, 09:08 PM)GetToFuckLeveinshinda Wrote: Having rules in a war No wait, this is.(03-28-2017, 09:12 PM)Acey Wrote: Left to rot is ridiculous hyperbole, not going to argue against that, and I know perfectly well what diminished responsibility means - the general point he was making though, that a lot of the reaction to this reduction in sentence is distasteful and hypocritical, is one I totally agree with. Baby steps with the lad Prancer; you can't be expecting Michael Walzer level stuff from him ![]() (03-28-2017, 09:21 PM)Charlie Kelly Wrote: Don't necessarily have an issue with his sentence being reduced and his charge being changed, it's the jubilation being shown that has me uneasy. The media are treating him as a hero and as if he's been exonerated, I realise all the stories say differently but the way it's being reported is all a bit crass for me. Exactly right. Without having seen the evidence, I can't really make a comment on the quashing of the murder sentence, but the quotes from the lawyers etc suggest that his previous conduct and an adjustment disorder were the key factors in having the charge dropped to manslaughter. "The judges said: “There can be little doubt that on 15 September 2011 the appellant was angry and vengeful and had a considerable degree of hatred for the wounded insurgent. On prior deployments, similar emotions had been controlled by him. “The appellant's decision to kill was probably impulsive and the adjustment disorder had led to an abnormality of mental functioning that substantially impaired his ability to exercise self-control.â€" Leaving aside all of my unfounded scepticism over the reasoning (something about that statement really doesn't sit right with me, regardless of the adjustment disorder and 'exceptional stressors') and whether a consistent approach would be employed had a British soldier been the victim, that's still an horrendous crime, and there was a crowd outside the court giving him three cheers, with banners and glorifying him with his face on posters. Distasteful isn't a strong enough word. I understand the reduction of the conviction, and I may even agree with it if I were to see the case, but celebrating it isn't pretty.
03-29-2017, 12:19 PM
Andy Coulson is now the PR advisor for the Telegraph
03-29-2017, 12:28 PM
03-29-2017, 12:49 PM
So he does
03-29-2017, 12:53 PM
You don't discover 'the god' particle and also be an easy going, life and soul of the party type chap, tbf.
Standard recluse.
"You’ll do plums"
03-29-2017, 12:58 PM
03-29-2017, 01:23 PM
I imagine he'll be getting led into custody shortly.
|
|
|




No wait, this is.
