02-20-2019, 10:16 AM
(02-20-2019, 09:54 AM)Makween Wrote: - For me the most worrying thing here is the way in which it seems to validate the idea that we have two-tier citizenship: citizenship can effectively be revoked under certain circumstances, but only when you commit certain forms of crime associated in the popular imagination with certain communities. If a guy called Colin, whose parents were American or Australian, went to Vietnam and beasted loads of kids would we be discussing the removal of citizenship? Of course we wouldn't - regardless of how heinous those crimes were, we'd be judging them in the U.K. The signal being sent here is that citizenship is conditional - but only if you're a brown person committing brown people crimes. This gives legal backing to the idea that, no matter where you were born or what it says on your passport, you don't really belong in the U.K. if you come from a minority ethnic/Muslim cultural background - or at least that your belonging is conditional in good behaviour in a way that it isn't for the majority of the population.
- For me, the argument about her being a young girl isn't really relevant. If she was a 45 year-old man, we should still take her back into the country.
This is absolutely spot on.


do some reading about the state of prisons these days, particularly English ones.