04-28-2020, 08:07 PM
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/a..._Messenger
That's a fairly significant difference to just try and palm off as if it was the plan all along to do it this way.
It's went from easing restrictions when there is absolutely no risk of it peaking to easing restrictions as long as the NHS isn't running over capacity.
Is this not a bit of the herd immunity stuff starting to creep back in or am I reading it wrong?
Quote: One of the five key tests for restrictions to be eased is that there will be no risk of a second peak of infections, but this was changed on one of the slides to say no risk of a second peak that overwhelms the NHS. No 10 insisted this had always been the case.
That's a fairly significant difference to just try and palm off as if it was the plan all along to do it this way.
It's went from easing restrictions when there is absolutely no risk of it peaking to easing restrictions as long as the NHS isn't running over capacity.
Is this not a bit of the herd immunity stuff starting to creep back in or am I reading it wrong?


They are truly fucked.
![[Image: Dv1rwAqW0AAl0s2.jpg]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dv1rwAqW0AAl0s2.jpg)