(01-26-2026, 06:55 PM)Drederick Shanktum Wrote: You said

“For what it's worth I would back Scotland and Hearts to not engage with the Israeli football association or do financial business with clubs there. ”

I think this is wrong and we would spend money there if it made us better

I still don't get your point.

I'm stating my personal position that I'd back my national association and local football club to not do business with all Israeli state affiliated organisations to ensure we are not funding the genocide of Palestinians.

What do you mean wrong?

Maybe I’m not getting this, but you’re saying you’d back hearts not to do business or spend money with Israeli clubs, I’m saying I think the opposite is true, we would spend money with them for a player that makes us better.

I'd take 20 million from Isis if they had the club at heart.

(01-26-2026, 07:08 PM)Drederick Shanktum Wrote: Maybe I’m not getting this, but you’re saying you’d back hearts not to do business or spend money with Israeli clubs, I’m saying I think the opposite is true, we would spend money with them for a player that makes us better.

You're definitely not getting it. You think the opposite is true that I back the club I support to not to do business with Israeli clubs currently if the situation arose?

I can tell you its true as it's my position. I literally already replied to you saying I know they likely would regardless and asked what your point is? Which you replied saying "this is wrong". What is wrong?

(01-26-2026, 07:14 PM)CritchSmile Wrote: You're definitely not getting it. You think the opposite is true that I back the club I support to not to do business with Israeli clubs currently if the situation arose?

I'm sure this all makes sense in your head but it's complete gobbledegook to read.

(01-26-2026, 07:25 PM)Shteve Wrote: I'm sure this all makes sense in your head but it's complete gobbledegook to read.

It's crystal clear. But for folk like you, i'll say it one more time.

I back all organisations that follow BDS guidelines, unfortunately i don't think Hearts or the Scottish national team would.

What can be evidenced is that Celtic do not follow BDS, so they are in no position to hold themselves to any superior moral position, not only do they not follow BDS, they are the lead investors in Israeli football in Scotland by a considerable distance.

Scott and Dred are not switched on enough to realise they’re arguing different uses of ‘back’.

(01-26-2026, 06:46 PM)CritchSmile Wrote: I back the Celtic

https://twitter.com/bluecoxtra/status/20...KB4RVIQVLw

Wee Neil is back. More suitable gig for him.

The Critches of Eastwick in the comments defending their man’s honour!

(01-29-2026, 01:49 PM)Groot Wrote: The Critches of Eastwick in the comments defending their man’s honour!

Just in case those cunts are reading this, I wouldn’t have him coach my Sunday league team.

Fuck knows why they have such a hard on for arguably the worst appointment of budge era hearts.

And that’s some going given the dross she’s been hoodwinked by over the years

In fairness to critch he's meant to be a very good coach and would explain his role within Liverpool.

Assistant manager focusing on the coaching side of things is probably quite suited to him.

Christ what a pipsqueak management team that is kumbaya, my lord every morning before firing the cones out.

Will probably be Chelsea manager in shree year.

That cunt will be living off his liverpool cv for years. fuck that guy

https://twitter.com/jamtarts/status/2016...64017?s=46

Establishment club

Anyone got a spare for St Mirren next Tuesday?

How is Corbett getting on Sky Sports 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6sGZlymhkE

Robbo and Gary Locke
1997
https://vm.tiktok.com/ZNRUgN8Er/

Apparently, Devlin will be back early March, with Shankland being a couple of weeks later.