03-10-2026, 08:49 AM
Going to sound like a boomer here, but those sentences are a joke
|
03-10-2026, 08:49 AM
Going to sound like a boomer here, but those sentences are a joke
03-10-2026, 08:52 AM
(03-09-2026, 10:17 PM)Shuto Makino Wrote: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c8r1kmz614po ![]() Won’t be a peep from the folk wanting to keep our communities safe.
03-10-2026, 11:02 AM
(03-09-2026, 10:17 PM)Shuto Makino Wrote: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c8r1kmz614po That is genuinely disturbing reading. Radicalised young men committing cold-blooded murder.
"You’ll do plums"
03-10-2026, 02:04 PM
Joey Barton has battered somebody with a baseball bat. Up in court today, hope he gets the jail
03-10-2026, 02:18 PM
03-10-2026, 02:22 PM
(Edited 03-10-2026, 02:23 PM by Del-icious.)
03-10-2026, 02:59 PM
Is he not currently on a suspended sentence? Surely getting the jail.
There's a voice note going about twitter and it seems he's absolutely done the guy in with a baseball bat. Psychopath.
03-11-2026, 01:03 PM
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cd9g...20released.
Grab your flags everyone. Someone has been stabbed in Wester Hailes for only the second time ever.
03-11-2026, 08:52 PM
How does that change anything Mak?
You're basically saying it's ok to let freaks into the country, because we already have freaks in the country.
03-11-2026, 08:54 PM
(03-11-2026, 01:03 PM)Shuto Makino Wrote: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cd9g...20released.The usual suspects
03-11-2026, 10:25 PM
(03-11-2026, 08:52 PM)King Kebab Wrote: How does that change anything Mak? What I'm saying is that THE IMMIGRINTS are not, as a population, any more likely to be 'freaks' than the people who are already here and that any argument to the effect that 'we need to prevent immigration because of stabbings' is therefore, at best, misinformed. I do agree, of course, that we need to open more safe, legal routes for immigrants to enter the country, which would allow us to screen for 'freaks' in a way that isn't possible when they can only do so illegally. That is something we both agree on.
03-14-2026, 04:36 PM
03-14-2026, 04:41 PM
(03-14-2026, 04:36 PM)Del-icious Wrote: https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1FdEcMfEXM/ He’ll serve less than half of it as well.
First TalkHearts Survivor Winner.
03-14-2026, 09:32 PM
03-14-2026, 09:39 PM
We’ve been kidded on again, Spittal is a pre-bloom jobber.
"You’ll do plums"
03-14-2026, 11:25 PM
First TalkHearts Survivor Winner.
03-14-2026, 11:34 PM
03-15-2026, 09:58 PM
I don't have any info about the case in particular beyond the media report here:
https://news.stv.tv/east-central/man-hur...m-with-axe "Assault to injury and to the danger of life" means that the victim suffered a relatively minor injury, fortunately. The law distinguishes between "injury" and "severe injury", as well as aggravators like "permanent disfigurement / impairment". "To the danger of life" means that the assault could potentially have put the guy's life at risk, as opposed to his life actually being in danger. The guy "admitted" the offences, meaning that he pled guilty. I suspect he'll have pled at the earliest practical opportunity, meaning that he'll likely have received the maximum sentencing discount of a third. So, it's entirely possible that the "starting point" for the sentence (pre-discount) was 6 years. You have to incentivise guilty pleas or the whole system would break down because everybody would just force the Crown to run trials for every offence. He's also 22, so the Sentencing Young People guideline applies (basic premise: U25s are thick as mince so they should be held as less culpable than adults with fully-formed brains). |
|
|